Hollywood's
Calling:
Part 2
OK,
last month we covered the moneymaking potential of licensing
your music to Film & TV and "how-to-get-your-foot-in-the-door." And while it's
true that music licensing can provide great exposure for
artists and labels, not to mention a nice stream of extra
income, you need to understand that your music is a valuable
asset (read the Intellectual Property 101 article in this
issue). You should tread carefully before you loosen any
control of it. The devil is in the details, as they say, and
the truth is that pursuing licensing deals can get
complicated. And if you’re an Indie artist or label whose
legal representation consists of your brother Earl, the
pre-law dropout, on speed-dial… well, you better have at
least a rudimentary understanding of how all this stuff
works.
It's
confusing to be sure. I spoke with several lawyers to
prepare this article, and my head was spinning by the end.
So I will avoid the messiest of details and hopefully give
you only what you need to negotiate from a position of
relative strength and knowledge. Of course, if you’re
about to sign a big licensing deal with a major studio or TV
production house, by all means… get a lawyer! But on
smaller deals, it may not be worth it. So you should be as
knowledgeable as you possibly can be in order to secure the
best deal.
First things
first. Be aware that there are really two separate
permissions to negotiate: There’s the use of the sound
recording itself, which compensates the owner of the master
recording. And then there’s the use of the song itself,
which involves paying those who wrote the song and/or own
the publishing rights to it. This way, the artist/label gets
paid for the recording, and the songwriter/publisher gets
compensated separately.
Same thing
for cover songs. A Punk band can get paid for the use of its
rockin’ U2 cover recording while Bono and the boys can get
paid for use of the song in a completely separate deal.
Often the person who wrote the song also owns the publishing
and masters, which can make the licensing process much
easier. Also keep in mind that the owner of the master
recording doesn’t benefit from the performance royalties
that rights organizations pay publishers and songwriters. So
if you own the recording but not the copyright on the song
itself, keep that in mind when negotiating your fee (More
about this next month in part three of this series).
For the music
supervisor, dealing with one entity that owns both the song
and the masters is a great way to cut out a lot of red tape
and meet deadlines. But it doesn’t mean song owners should
necessarily agree to wrap everything into one deal.
"Don’t get tied down," says Ken Burry, a partner
at Greenberg Taurig’s entertainment practice in Los
Angeles. "Don’t talk about just one price." For
example, producer may offer you a one-time $200 to use your
song, which may sound great (and beat the hell out of what
you made at your last gig). But why not ask for two separate
contracts? You might be able to negotiate a publishing fee
of $150 and another master license of $150—coming out to
$300 total, which obviously puts you in a better overall
position.
Burry also
suggests asking for a "step deal," especially if
it’s an indie flick without much of a budget. That way,
you can agree to that piddly $50 up front but limit the
license to just the indie film festival circuit. In many
cases, the indie film producers are simply hoping to bag a
distribution deal at a festival anyway, at which point they
will have plenty of money to pay you more. You can either
negotiate specific step payments up front or leave the
negotiation for later (often the second option puts you in a
better position because your song is already part of the
movie at this point). "If you’re doing a deal with an
indie, there’s no reason not to try to benefit on the back
end," says Burry.
A step deal
can get pretty granular and might work like this. You get
one fee for the festival, another for theatrical release,
another if the movie makes it onto TV, another when it hits
DVD, and so on. You could also link payments to the movie’s
financial success (After the box office hits $10 million,
you get a payment of X). You could even negotiate specific
mechanical royalties for the soundtrack album, which are
becoming easier to release because of digital distribution,
and negotiate terms for the promotional uses of the song in
trailers. Even within trailers, the fees could be different
for an "in-context" use in which the song plays
with the scene in the movie or an "out-of-context"
use in which the song is used over a montage of different
scenes not originally associated with the song (Did I
mention this was complicated?).
The bottom
line is that you need to feel out the situation. If the film
or TV project is a small endeavor, though, you might have
some wiggle room. After all, an indie producer is probably
just hoping to get their movie out there and would likely be
happy to pay you more if the film ends up a huge success.
"They’re just trying to get the deal done," says
Larry Iser, a partner at L.A.-based law firm Greenberg
Glusker. "They’re not thinking it will sell a lot of
tickets." Of course, demanding too much complexity in
your deal could actually irritate the music supervisor to
the point that he or she would walk away and just use
another song.
When you’re
reasonable, you’re really helping the music supervisor
help you. For example, Alexandra Patsavas, owner of the
L.A.-based The Chop Shop, makes a real effort to find
up-and-coming bands for her impressive slate of hit TV
shows, including The O.C., Without A Trace, Grey’s
Anatomy and many more. Patsavas says indie artists can
make between $600 and $3,000 per TV placement. That’s free
money! Don’t waste her time! "If you’re focused on
placing music in television, definitely watch the show and
get a feel for what the music supervisors are using,"
she says.
You also don’t
want to be too difficult during negotiations when people
like Patsavas are out there trying to give you a fair shake.
If you’re a largely unknown artist, and a big studio or TV
production house wants to pay you good money to use your
song and give you massive exposure, they will probably want
to wrap most of the backend into a nice upfront payment
rather than trying to keep track of several step payments.
"They all basically have tried to do buyouts—paying
one time and never paying again," says Owen Sloane, a
music lawyer at the L.A. office of Berger Kahn. You need to
ask yourself whether you really want to risk losing the deal
because you want something on the back end.
Remember: The
bigger the film or TV project, the less leverage you have.
"Spielberg’s guy might say, `hey, you’re lucky to
be in the film," says Oren Warshavsky, a music lawyer
at Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger and Vecchione. So be
careful! Feel it out. See if you can negotiate a little bit
of flexibility and, if you can’t, enjoy that nice upfront
fee and exposure!
(EDITOR’S
NOTE: In part three of this series next month, we’ll
explore the mysterious world of performance royalties and
how those checks can keep rolling in long after you’ve
spent that upfront money).
(Mike
Grebb is a writer, journalist and
singer/songwriter based in Washington, D.C. He has written
for numerous publications, including Wired
and Billboard. He just completed his debut solo
record, Resolution, which is available at www.mikegrebb.com,
as well as digitally on iTunes, MSN Music, Musicmatch,
Yahoo! Music Unlimited and other sites. Mike will also be an
instructor at a songwriting workshop in Takoma Park, MD, on
Oct. 22. Check www.emergingsongwriters.com
for sign-up info).
|